Argumentative Essay Topics That Are Too Much For You

Argumentative Essay Topics That Are Too Much For YouThe best way to improve your grades and earn good marks is to present an argumentative essay that will convince your instructor that you are indeed the best candidate for that assignment. However, not every topic is appropriate for a persuasive essay, some of them may be too much for you. Here are some tips for deciding what essay topics are too much for you.Arguments about controversial issues like climate change and evolution fall under argumentative essay topics that you are sure will get you on the hook and make you earn good marks. Most students who disagree with these issues will do anything to keep it from being taught in schools. In order to make your argument an effective one, you need to persuade your instructor. So, if you feel that it's going to be too difficult for you to convince your instructor that you have a strong case for your view, then go with a less controversial topic instead.Another reason why you might want to avoid arguing topic that is controversial is that your teacher may be looking to choose topics more likely to be controversial. If the professor is leaning towards something controversial and you happen to be the person who disagrees with it, you might find yourself in a more difficult position. However, if you find that you will be attending a class on an issue that is highly controversial, then you should consider presenting your counter-argument to those who do not agree with it.Another reason why you might want to avoid argumentative essay topics that are too intense is that they might just get you in trouble. Sometimes, teachers might be too lenient when it comes to handing out grades and leniency might cost you points in the end. As a student, you do not want to be in a situation where you are in trouble over something that you didn't do or anything that you really don't care about.Another thing that you want to avoid is arguments that are based on personal experiences. The se arguments tend to be too emotional and might just cause you more trouble than they are worth. Most professors will not think that it is necessary to educate their students about their personal experience and that is why you want to avoid making statements that reflect how you feel about something.Lastly, you will want to avoid essay topics that involve political or subjective issues. If your professor has already informed you that he thinks this topic is too subjective, then you should avoid it. Political views are typically considered to be subjective and when your professor assigns you a topic like this, it's only going to make things more difficult for you.You should always keep in mind that professors are not going to try to trick you into thinking that a particular topic is too difficult for you. If they believe that a particular topic is too challenging for you, then they will assign it to another student. After all, they do not want to spend their time and effort teaching an argumentative essay topic that other students have no problem with.If you know that your essay topic is too much for you, then you should continue to strive to write a persuasive essay. Your professor probably has a file on you somewhere and it is likely that you can locate an interesting, argumentative essay topic and get a good grade while you're at it.

The Buffalo Creek Disaster - 2200 Words

The Buffalo Creek Disaster (Case Study Sample) Content: Name: Instructor: Course: Date: The Buffalo Creek Disaster A critical aspect of ethics and corporate social responsibility is the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s obligation to compensate victims of a disaster for any harm caused. In law, compensatory justice is recognized as a fundamental principle of ethics, sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Most disasters occur as a result of failure of companies to address risks that it creates or are within their property. According to Harvard Business Review on Corporate Ethics, the international disaster law places obligations on corporations of preventing disasters especially where the company has full control over known risks and hazards. Organizations have the legal duty of safeguarding human rights where they have knowledge of possible risks that may lead to a disaster. In the recent past for instance, corporate social responsibility and business ethics movements have been formed in response to the increasing corporate environmental violations. This paper explores the Buffalo Creek dis aster, business ethical principles, corporate responsibility to minimize disasters as well as responding when disaster occur in the context of human rights and corporate social responsibility. Corporations are driven by ethical values. Empirically, not all the values are ethical in nature; some are technical while others are prudential. While the technical values express the skilled operation of an organization, prudential values express the urgency to evade legal actions or repercussions. The Buffalo Creek disaster is acknowledged as one of the most historical landmark case because of its attempt to successfully compensate a community from a disaster. It occurred in 1972 in Virginia where one hundred and twenty five people died after the collapse of a coal waste dam (Schwartz-Barcott 34). Buffalo Creek disaster caused injuries, trauma as well as massive loss of properties. Furthermore, the disaster led to displacement of people from their indigenous residence. The case enlightens people with respect to psychological trauma caused collectively to a community. Generally, the duty to human rights belong to the state and these obligations are not easily transferable. However, although the state holds the primary duty to human rights, the law requires corporations to avoid activities that infringe individualà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s basic human rights. Corporations have a legal duty to protect the community residing within a particular sphere of influence. Businesses have the obligation to protect individuals who have associative ties with the corporation including local residence or employment (Griseri and Nina 94). The United Nations guiding regulations on corporations and individual human rights not only include the duty to avoid particular actions but also places a responsivity of taking actions supporting positive human rights. As an ethical principle, the UN encourages corporations to publish human rights policy statement that is accessible to all stakeholders. The policy statement should also identify possible hazards that may occur in the c ompany. Additionally, corporations needs to identify a department and assign individuals with the responsibility of enforcing human rights. The department should be fully equipped with financial and human resources to enable it address issues related to human rights. Disasters take place because actors who have the capacity to manage such hazards ignore them. Before a disaster takes place, companies have the obligation of undertaking due diligence in order to understand how particular actions may lead to the rise of a disaster. Corporations are required to flag possible hazards that are associated with their business, industry and site as well as identifying potential social, environmental and other kinds of hazards that could trigger the occurrence of a disaster. The Buffalo Creek disaster is an excellent case study that demonstrates corporations overall duty of preventing disasters. Through this case, it is clear that the extent of corporate duty depends on hazards that the corporation is exposed to. In the Buffalo Creek disaster for instance, little was done to prevent the tailings dam from blowing. In addition, it was discovered that suggestions to prevent the dam tailings from turning into a full blown disaster were ignored for a long time (Vogel 18). No disaster audit had been conducted to ensure due diligence and protection of human rights. As a result of the corporationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s failure to mitigate known hazards of the dam, people died while others were internally displaced. Corporate ethical responsibility for preventing disaster is sensible as it holds parties with power and ability to make operational changes accountable. Where it is impossible to make changes, United Nations ethical principles requires contingency plans to be put in place for protecting individuals who live within the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s sphere (Schwartz-Barcott 22). Although the state remain the principal fiduciary for enforces human rights, it becomes hard to ensure that a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s hazards have been addressed adequately for instance beyond making legislations as well as inspections. Corporations need to examine their duty to the society as human rights duties instead of voluntary CSR programs in order to prioritize disaster mitigation by reducing corporationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s exposure to possible hazards. It is ethically wrong to be found guilty of negligence of proper maintenance of industrial facilities. It ruins the reputation of a corporation and the general public perceives badly such a corporation. Corporations held liable for viola...

Compare Contrast Essay - How to Write a Topic Comparison Essay

Compare Contrast Essay - How to Write a Topic Comparison EssayWhen you are writing a topic idea, compare contrast with a topic that you have already written. When you write compare contrast, you are taking information from two different subjects and bringing them together to make a single conversation. It is an interesting way to bring two different topics together.There are many reasons why you should compare contrast with information already available. In some cases, the information can be researched. The same is true of other information. However, if the information is written, you may not have time to research it or you may not want to spend the time it takes to research information.If you can find some easy information, you should be able to write an interesting essay that will make your reader stop to think about what you are saying. Also, when comparing information that is easy to find, you will know how easy or difficult it is to research. If a topic is difficult to research, you will know that you need to write something new. Sometimes, this is easier said than done.Another reason why writing a great essay is a good idea is because if your topic is easy to research, you will be able to write one easily. Some topics are extremely difficult to research and that makes it harder to write an interesting essay. You will not be able to write an interesting essay, when a topic is difficult to research. If a topic is research intensive, you will be able to write a more in depth essay.When you write an essay compare contrast, you are starting to form ideas about two different topic ideas. When you look at the information that you have to work with, you can see what other things you should add. Sometimes, the information will be so different that it will be easy to change the idea you have.It is a good idea to research on the information that you have to work with. You will be able to use what you find and the information that you can do without. Sometimes, if yo u can read between the lines, you can find what to change and what to keep. That is a big help when you are writing compare contrast essays.Finding information on topics can also come in handy. You can see what is not possible to write about. The last thing you want to do is have to rewrite a topic idea because it was not possible to research.Writing a topic comparison essay can take some time. By combining two different topics and comparing contrast, you can save time and effort.